So this article has been bumping around in my head for a while. Probably because I’ve read books/seen movies that left me cringing at the stereotypes/clichés that popped their heads up.
I do admit to being a bit of a stickler for good characters and a little piece of me dies when I see/read anything where there is the heavily clichéd archetype dynamic!
(I’ve even seen it touted as something that should be used as a template for creating characters *shudder*)
You know the one I mean, where the cast list reads like:
* Plucky Sidekick
* Comic Relief (sometimes amalgamated into the Plucky sidekick)
* Evil Villain
* Love Interest
Maybe it’s just me, but that can feel really trite at times. Don’t get me wrong, I’ve read some great books and seen some great movies where they follow this basic premise lightly and it works. But honestly, those are rare.
So today I am going to discuss some of the stereotypes that drive me insane and since this became a longer post than I expected, I will be splitting it into two and today I will be discussing Female Characters.
NB: These are my personal opinions on what can ruin an otherwise good book for me. You might not agree with some or even all of these which is totally fine. So enjoy your own opinion and please don’t feel the need to flame me if you don’t agree.
THE CLOTHES HORSE
Psst! Here’s a secret, not all women give a fuck about clothes, fashion and owning shoes. Yes there are some that do, but there are also some that don’t.
So, if you are writing female characters, please don’t feel that you need to make a big deal about their clothes, or their love of clothes and shoes and shopping for said clothes and shoes. For those women like me, who can’t think of anything more boring to do than shop for clothes and try on shoes, it would be nice to have a change.
This is especially important if you have multiple female characters. Just mix it up a little! Don’t make all your female characters gush about shoes or crave the newest Prada handbag. This obsession with material fashion often makes characters look shallow.
Now, on a side note if you were GOING for shallow or if your character fits with the love of clothes for whatever reason, then fine. Just be careful you aren’t falling straight into a typical stereotype that’s been done to death.
This is something you see more in art than writing but it appears to be creeping into writing as well. Some female character, created as a warrior, ready to slay dragons or fight evil warlords and what do you kit her out in?
Yes, some completely useless, horrifically non-functional metal bikini. Adding some gauntlets and greaves (that’s the metal piece that protects the shins/knees) will not make this abomination anything other than pointless.
Yet I have seen writers both of traditional stories and comics insist on having these so-called “Warrior Women” running around scantily clad as they protect the city or fight for revenge. Since a severed femoral artery (found in the inner thigh) can have you bleed out in minutes, maybe cladding your character in actual armour that protects them would be an idea? Just a thought.
Stop making female warriors into sex objects. If you want a female character to be a fighter/warrior character then dress her appropriately. Not sure what that would look like? Watch The Messenger: The Story of Joan of Arc to see how they dressed Milla Jovovich when she was kicking ass.
And while we are on the subject of armour…it does NOT need to be contoured around a woman’s breasts. That, again, makes it sexualised.
THE HOPELESS ROMANTIC
Think carefully about the role of your female characters. Women are often written into stories (and movies) as Passive characters. They can often be just a romantic interest and everything they do circles around their need for a man….or a baby.
Even in books where the protagonist is female and is saving the world, I’ve still seen the need to wedge in some driving urge for these women to be searching for a man.
Am I against relationships? No. Am I against women looking for a partner? No. But does it have to be in every book? No.
Romance/love interests can work well in books. However they can also ruin them. I’ve read a number of books in my time in which the romance felt forced, as if the author had just wedged it in due to some expectation. Often a female love interest is there purely as some goal or reward for the male character or she is to be killed off and act as a kind of trigger to set him on his quest after he fucked off to brood when things were getting too tough.
If you’ve created this strong independent female character, don’t ruin that by suddenly showing that she’s lost without a man or that her life is empty without a baby.
And if you don’t want a strong female character, at least make her something more than just the prize at the end. Seriously.
NB: If you are writing romance where the whole concept is about finding love etc, then it will work better. But let’s still make the female characters a little more 3 dimensional.
Personally I like to read strong women characters. For years my gender seemed to only occupy roles were women were to be rescued, to be coveted, to be won like some prize at a marrow throwing contest (do they throw marrows? Is that a thing?)
However I think some people aren’t clear on what “Strong Women” means. It does not automatically mean that they are physically strong, nor do they need to be excellent fighters.
Strength comes in many forms and it can be built up or torn down. A strong character can end up weaker and a weak character can end up stronger. A character may appear weak but in a time of crisis can show a strength the reader didn’t know was there.
Also, if you do make a female character strong, it does not mean you need to masculinise (is that a word?) them. Often we see being emotional, caring, empathetic as female traits. They are also still often seen in a negative light and as a weakness.
So authors will sometimes compensate by making their strong female character almost stoic, aloof and leaning towards more (stereotypical) masculine traits (we will discuss that more in next week’s article about Stereotypical MALE characters).
THE CLARK KENT BEAUTY
This is best described with movies since it is a sin that occurs waayyyy too often in film. This is the one where the “plain-Jane” character with her glasses, ponytail, flat chest and non-fashionable clothes is miraculously transformed at the end of the movie when her hair pins are removed, her glasses come off and she wears some figure-hugging dress that was hidden in her closet and shows OMG she actually does have a cleavage (apparently that’s super important in terms of beauty! *eyeroll*).
I call it the Clark Kent Beauty since all Mr CK did was gel back his hair, remove his glasses and change his clothes. Not buying it buddy! (He would totally be screwed in today’s world with Facial recognition, am I right?)
It’s just not needed. Beauty is subjective and we definitely need to tread carefully when we continue to focus on characters that start out in some weird standardised image of “unattractive” and then transform them into another weird standardised image of “attractive”.
We don’t need to see a tomboy character wearing a dress to show she is beautiful, we don’t need to see a science nerd remove her glasses to be considered attractive. Make your characters lovable, relatable and attractive in their own way.
THE ANGRY FEMINIST
This probably strikes a sharper cord with me because in the real world, many women who consider themselves feminists are treated like crap due to people’s opinions of what “being a feminist” means.
As with all things, there will always be a minority that fit those opinions however MOST feminists are not men-haters, they are not angry, they are not wanting women to be solely in charge or to oppress men.
So let’s stop using “feminist” as a negative term and stop perpetuating the negative image that people have tagged onto that word.
THE TWENTY-SOMETHING MODEL
Unless your story is set in America’s Next Top Model house, then please let’s throw in some variety. Not all female characters should be the same age and that age should not be only ever under 30.
Let’s try some differences and no I don’t mean having a blonde, a red head and a brunette. I want to see REAL characters, I want to see different body sizes, I want to see different heights, I want to see disabled characters, I want to see different aged characters and different versions of beauty.
By the way, let’s try some realism as well. If your character is thin, than unless she had plastic surgery, 9 times out of 10, her boobs are going to be small to match her figure. Let’s avoid DD boobs on svelte women.
Let’s also avoid larger women all feeling insecure and wanting to lose weight as their ultimate goal (usually as a way to snag themselves a man). There are many larger sized women who rock their curves and love their bodies. Let’s see more of that.
Positive body images people!
Laugh lines, stretch marks, birthmarks, port-wine stains, freckles… these and all other physical traits are part of being human and should be embraced. If all your female characters have smooth skin, no blemishes, no wrinkles….then they lose their realism.
The gay community is underrepresented in fiction and too often when lesbian characters are created (especially by straight authors) they are written as stereotypes.
If we think about traditional gender roles and behaviours, we can broadly class them as “masculine” and “feminine”. This covers the career someone has, how they act, talk, dress and look.
Some women will look and act in a way that seems to fall under the traditional “masculine” sense while others will appear in a traditional feminine way and all other women fall somewhere in between.
From this we consider two points, firstly it is independent of their sexuality so the cliche of lesbians being heavily masculine will no doubt be true for a small proportion of lesbians but not all.
Secondly, the concept of traditional notions of masculine and feminine is what gives rise to a lot of cliches. However as a society, we are now increasingly aware of the fact that “masculine / feminine” traits, physical gender and sexuality are three different things.
If you chose to have a lesbian character then remember that is one aspect of that character. It is not her defining quality. Don’t make her sexuality the entirety of her characterisation. Real people, regardless of their sexuality, are multifaceted.
THE VIRGIN, THE MOTHER, THE SLUT
I was once told that a “good” female character, needed to fall into one of these three. Let’s sidestep the awfulness of that “advice” and discuss these:
The Virgin – naive, young, innocent, pure. These are the words people associate with this word. They are also limiting. Let me give you an example, a young girl lives with her father who is a drug addict. Every day she watches him get strung out on his drug of choice, sees how he’s losing more of himself. She grows up fast, learning to steal just to feed herself. She’s 12 and she’s a virgin. Would those four words really describe her? Maybe – if only you consider her in terms of sexual experience.
The Mother – caring, nurturing, supportive. When I’ve asked people, these are the words that come to mind when you think “Mother”. Okay, but what about an abusive mother? An absent mother? A neglectful mother?
The Slut – easy, cheap, dirty. More words that are often connected to Slut. But this word is used to describe a woman regarding sexual experience. And society still isn’t too happy with a woman who likes sex, who is experienced or knows her own body and wants. So we diminish a woman like that with a label, a negative label.
So – what did we learn from these three words? Simple – they are limiting. They provoke thoughts and images often that society has already manipulated. They are not ways to define a character because characters are types of people and people are complex.
Overall, you need to create good, multilayered characters that can enrich your story.
First apology, sorry for the lack of a post last Friday. When I get sad and moody, I tend to vanish and sulk. I am feeling better now. Big thanks to those of you who sent me messages and emails xx
Second apology, sorry for the length of this post, it definitely got away from me and as I wrote it, the damn thing just kept growing!
NB: Photo purchased from depositphotos.com (supporting other creatives) 🙂